|
Classic Bikes
Custom Bikes
Individual
Racing Bikes AJP
AJS
Aprilia
Ariel
Avinton / Wakan
Bajaj
Benelli
Beta
Bimota
BMW
Brough Superior
BRP Cam-Am
BSA
Buell / EBR
Bultaco
Cagiva
Campagna
CCM
CF Moto
Combat Motors
Derbi
Deus
Ducati
Excelsior
GASGAS
Ghezzi Brian
Gilera
GIMA
Harley Davidson
Hero
Highland
Honda
Horex
Husaberg
Husqvarna
Hyosung
Indian
Jawa
Kawasaki
KTM
KYMCO
Laverda
Lazareth
Magni
Maico
Mash
Matchless
Mondial
Moto Guzzi
Moto Morini
MV Agusta
MZ / MuZ
NCR
Norton
NSU
Paton
Peugeot
Piaggio
Revival Cycles
Roland Sands
Royal Enfield
Sachs
Sherco
Sunbeam
Suzuki
SWM
SYM
Triumph
TVS
Ural
Velocette
Vespa
Victory
Vincent
VOR
Voxan
Vyrus
Walt Siegl
Walz
Wrenchmonkees
Wunderlich
XTR / Radical
Yamaha
Zero
Video
Technical
Complete Manufacturer List
|
Suzuki GSX-R 1100
No changes from the previous year to the bike, engine or chassis - only graphic changes As motorcycles have evolved, perspectives on the GSXR1100 have changed. When the bike was new, magazines lauded its power, handling and relative lack of weight. But today's authors who compare it against 1994's introduction of the Supersports bikes, driven by Tadao Baba's development of the Honda Fireblade, can use 20/20 hindsight to be more critical. Recent articles, some with head to head comparisons with newer sportbikes, still rave about the powerful 1100 cc engine but otherwise describe the GSXR1100 as large, heavy, and unstable. Some of these assertions are borne out by Suzuki's year-to-year tinkering with the frame geometry in order to make the bike handle better. The result is that different years have different handling characteristics on the road. Earlier bikes are lighter but the square-section alloy frame is prone to warping under extreme stress; later models are more rigid and offer increased power but suffer from increased weight. The 1989 (K model) fitted the 1100 engine (the first use of the now legendary and highly tunable and strong 1127 cc oil-air-cooled design) into a new heavier, shorter and stiffer frame based on the previous year's updated and extremely well received GSXR750J (the first of the 'Slingshot bikes, named after the mix of flat-slide on one side and flat slide with a curve on the other Mukuni carbs). Magazine testers trying out the machines gave rave reviews but something was changed between then and the bikes going on sale. The 'Slingshot' 1100 K sold in the shops suffered handling problems, some claimed as a result of changed geometry, others said there was nothing wrong with the frame and that it was the suspension units that were set up all wrong. Whatever it was, the standard bike was thought hard to handle and many modern magazines go so far as to advise buyers to avoid the "K" model, some even calling that year a “lemon”. This was an attitude that was reinforced with the death of the Suzuki racer Phil Mellor at the Isle of Man in 1989 on the GSXR-1100K race bike. Jamie Whitham also crashed in the same race and it was enough to see the race authorities at the IOM ban the big bikes from racing for several years. In 1990 the (L Model) bike was again tweaked and the wheelbase lengthened to correct the previous year's handling problems. 1991 (M model) saw the addition of larger carburetors and major cosmetic changes when the fairing was reworked to place the headlights under a smooth plastic cover that helped the bike’s aerodynamics. 1992 (N model) was mechanically the same but offered more aggressive graphics in line with the time. It was also the last year of the oil-cooled engines as the bike was re-designed for 1993. 1993 (WP model) saw major engine changes with the introduction of water cooling and some significant chassis changes. The move away from oil cooling allowed a surge in power, bringing total output to 155 bhp at the crank and saw yet another hugely strong, reliable and extremely tunable Suzuki engine created (Performance Bike in the UK reported on one taken to over 190 bhp at the wheel – without the use of a turbo or nitrous oxide injection). A new stiffer largely forged five-sided pentagonal cross-section frame was introduced along with an asymmetrical 'banana' swing-arm. Bigger Nissin six-piston brake calipers were fitted. The bike’s weight went up slightly as well, finally topping the 500-pound mark that Suzuki had been flirting with for years, but the overall look of the bike remained essentially the same as previous models. 1994 (WR model) saw nothing but colour changes. Throughout the water-cooled years, 1993 to 1998, the GSXR’s design saw only one relatively major revision with the launch of the 1995 WS; everything else on the 1996 WT, 1997 WV and 1998 WW models was restricted to mere colour and graphics changes. IMany owners say these bikes are the easiest to live with and the most well rounded. Good fuel economy is even possible (over 45 mpg on a long cruising run * imp gallon)15,9 km/l and the slight changes made to the foot-peg position on the WS-on models even made distances a much less daunting prospect. In reality the bike had become a highly competent and monstrously fast (177 mph was measured as the max speed of the standard WS bike by one UK bike magazine, Superbike in 1995) sports-touring machine, a far cry from its race-born origins. It is clear the design had reached its fullest form in the mid 1990s but that in terms of the leading edge of sports bike design it was already outdated and left behind as competition spurred the development of ever more powerful, ever lighter sport bikes. This was demonstrated nowhere else more clearly than Suzuki's own brand-new 1996 GSXR750WT, a return to the ultra-lightweight with a new beam frame, the SRAD design, which offered approx 115 bhp at the rear wheel - coupled with the added boost from the new pressurised airbox design (always particularly efficient on Suzukis - Fast Bikes in the UK once measured a full 10 bhp increase in power on the Crescent Racing shop's dyno and wind tunnel @ 120 mph in 2003 with a GSXR1000). All at a chassis weight 'cost' on the GSXR750WT of only 179 KG (394 LBs). 1998 saw the last GSXR1100s roll off the assembly line and, despite how popular the bike had been in its heyday, there was no hue and cry as production quietly stopped. Suzuki would be without a big bore sportbike for three years before the GSXR1000 was released. Despite the fact that over its production run tens of thousands of GSXR1100s were produced and sold all over the world, original examples in good condition have become something of a rarity. Many bikes were ridden hard and they were often crashed. As a result, they became and remain a popular starting point for street fighters and customs. The bike is a tuner's favorite - all versions respond well to tuning and even early models can make 140 hp (104 kW) at the wheel with relative ease. Simple intake modifications and a good exhaust will yield upwards of 10 hp (7 kW) increase. More enthusiastic tuning will see 160 hp (119 kW) or more, and many drag racers use superchargers or turbochargers with this engine to break the 500 hp (370 kW) mark. Source: wikipedia.com
Review
Do the '94 FZR 1000
and GSX-Rl 100 still cut the mustard or has Honda's 900 killed them off?
Franklin and Forsyth fit cut slicks and loud pipes to the Yamaha and Suzuki,
junk the restrictors and go in search of the elusive deserted road to find out.
Yamaha FZR1000 Exup Nobody who rode the Exup returned without a smile. A big, Cheshire cat-sized
smile. Without exception everyone's first words were blasphemous, foul or
unintelligible. Nobody was unimpressed. For what is basically a four-year-old bike the Exup still delivers the goods
in a fantastically composed and powerful package: explosive bottom-end torque
and arm-stretching top end power. Ride it fast in the wet and all of a sudden
you begin to appreciate just how powerful it really is. Like anything else with
125bhp and only two wheels, it'll bite you if you treat it cackhandedly. But there is an inbuilt level of safety. It's so stable at speed you'd swear
it's running some sort of ground-effect system. It doesn't matter whether it's a
fourth gear sweeper with a mid-corner dip or a kink over a crest; the Exup never
waggles, wobbles or weaves. Compared with the more unruly GSX-R it's a big
pussycat. This year's six pot front brake calipers have made the already safe Exup
safer still. There's an incredible amount of stopping power now; one finger's
enough to scythe off speed with such ferocity it really does tax your forearms.
One rider said the Exup's brakes felt more powerful than the engine. A 125bhp
engine and 130bhp brakes: just what you need for staying alive. The brakes provide the new Öhlins USD forks with the ultimate test of
bendability. They're set up for a comfortable ride, with soft springing and
compression damping, but they aren't prone to flexing — far from it. Where the
forks do fail is under hard braking (with one finger, remember) over rippled
surfaces. As soon as they get the slightest hint of front brake they dive for
cover, leaving no travel for bump absorption. Approaches to bumpy corners leave
a series of small skid marks as the front wheel struggles to stay in contact
with the undulating tarmac. Even with a cut slick fitted. But through faster, smoother corners the Exup has impeccable manners. You'd
be hard pressed to find a bike that feels as composed when you're really tonkin'.
Fitting slicks is probably the worst thing you could do to this legendary high
speed stability; they bugger it completely, making a beslicked Exup an
unpredictable monster through fast corners. Will it tankslap you into a ditch?
Will that twitching turn into something more serious? A bit like a Fireblade,
really. On stock rubber, though, there's none of this funny business. The standard
Dunlops are much nicer than cut slicks in a variety of situations. That crucial
moment — the transition from vertical to lean — is much less worrying on the OE
tyres as the cut slicks made the Exup wobble like crazy in really fast corners.
Once it was actually at full lean it was fine, but those moments before it would
dance around like a CX500 with knackered head bearings. Although the cut slicks could find an unbelievable amount of grip at the apex
and exit of a turn, the steering would go horribly light and unpredictable as
the bike powered out. Yes, give us road-based rubber any day. Rupert summed up
the Exup on slicks: "It's bloody horrible. It feels like an old GSX-RU00K."
Nail on the proverbial head. You see, normally, the Exup is a delight to ride quickly and smoothly. The
way it delivers its creamy-smooth power means that the rider isn't constantly
stirring the gear lever to keep the engine on the boil. Even the mighty
GSX-R1100 engine feels a bit wheezy by comparison. On a twisty B road the Yamaha
rarely needs more than 6,000rpm to blur the hedgerows. You can rev it harder, or
go faster, but it'll scare the pants off you, as well as whoever's coming the
other way/following. The fastest and smoothest way from A to B is to shortshift
through the five gears and wind open the throttle. There's enough midrange
torque to humble a Harley. FZR1000 comfort is a moot point. Some people, me included, think the Exup is
one of the most uncomfortable long distance bikes ever: back ache, wrist and
neck cramps, numb bum and an excruciatingly painful perineum. Others, like
Trevor Franklin, think the Exup is actually comfortable, but he's a bat fastard
with more padding than me. Roop says it's fine at 120mph on German autobahns. To
fit an Exup perfectly you need a short back and very long arms. Like a gibbon. But bloater or not, everyone was impressed by the new YZF-style fairing which
successfully shields the rider from tiring lOOmph wind blast, exploding bumble
bees and those huge flies that are filled with what looks like rhubarb and
custard. The fairing also houses the much-acclaimed and celebrated fuel reserve
switch, which I'm not going to say anything about because it's more boring than
aYamaha trade seminar. Grumbles? Yes. Yamaha could learn a thing or two from Suzuki on the gearbox
and clutch front. The GSX-R1100, like every other Suzuki in the range (except
the RGV250), has one of the slickest, sweetest, smoothest, most trustworthy
transmissions in the business. The Exup, by comparison, has one of the worst.
Gear selection isn't a problem — although it's not as light and positive as the
Suzuki's it's that bleedin' 'orrible clutch action. Progressive and predictable
it is not. Noisy, grabby and feeble it most certainly is. Why, oh why, oh why
haven't Yamaha done something about it? I mean it's not as if we haven't
complained about it before. The Exup is still a great bike; dated, yes, but its massive power and
stability remain a valid alternative to the lighter, sharper, twitchier
Fireblade. Sadly, every dog has its day and while the 900 Honda is still in its
prime the big Yamaha is approaching creaky old age. Roll on the YZF900. Mark Forsyth Suzuki GSX-R1100W Wrenching open the throttle at 6,000rpm should have produced enough power to
push the rear tyre solidly into tarmac and hoik the front end skyward. Sadly,
and to my disbelief, it wasn't. The Suzuki bogged down as if receiving only
quarter throttle. Hurried clutch slip gave the necessary drive to miss 38 tonnes of Renault
truck and, in the safety of the adjoining B-road, I tried again, with only
marginal wheel-hopping success. Exaggerated clutch slip with a good pull on the
clip-ons gets it up, missus, but at the possible expense of mechanical
destruction. What a difference from the old oil-cooled 1100 phased out in 1992. Suzuki
have fitted the watercooled engine with huge, 40mm carbs for top end power, then
restricted it to 115bhp: worst of both worlds. "It takes a long time to get to a hundred," remarked Technical Editor
Theodopilus Robinson after a morning on the GSX-R. I agree, but the quarter
miles shame both our ramblings: GSX-R: 10.93s @ 124.5mph. Exup: 10.96s @
126.1mph. Either old age and raging senility has affected us or standing start
acceleration is a useless measure of midrange throttle response. Helping keep the GSX-R on the pace is one of the best five speed gearboxes
ever. Bimbling around town two-up with a tight chain gives no notchy clunks up
or down the box. Even under the severest abuse, using the rev limiter instead of
closing the throttle, gear changes are precise. Better still, numerous quarter
mile attempts and tread-wasting long-distance wheelspins (Mark won, on the FZR)
failed to upset the Suzuki's hydraulic clutch. The Yamaha's became so grabby
after only two launches it was put to one side and ignored like a naughty
schoolboy. GSX-R1100 suspension gets more than its fair share of complaints: over
complicated, can't get it right, what suits one doesn't suit the other.... It's
all justified if half-wits disrupt standard settings in a vain attempt to better
them. The WR isn't perfect, but it doesn't take a lot to put it right. There's nothing seriously wrong with the front end. It dives alarmingly when
all 12 caliper pistons clench the discs as tightly as your bum cheeks in a
last-hope braking manoeuvre (yes, the brakes are the sort to cause a
tackle-to-tank collision; awesome). My cure: up compression from the stock seven
clicks to nine and wind the preload in three lines. The rear shock works fine on A-roads and motorways, smoothing out the bumps
even over cats' eyes and approach warning lines at roundabouts. Bumpy B-roads
and tight corner exits make the bike wallow (feels like a flat rear tyre) then
squat under power. It's nothing scary; it just makes the bike a bit harder to
pick up for the next corner. Because it happens in the low gears, where the
chain is wrenching the swing arm upwards most strongly, it's better to use extra
preload rather than compression damping. I left it alone, hoping a lack of food
on the journey north would compensate. Over the years, GSX-R engine specs have changed. Shame the frame design
hasn't. Apart from extra bracing and a stretched wheelbase, it's still based on
the original 1986 twin rail jobbie. Too high, too much metal needed to make it
stiff. The bodywork has undergone more annual surgery than anything else to keep up
with the opposition, but it's choice — true race replica in design and it looks
the business. The Lazer 4-2-1 we fitted helps; even Mark, who's used to racing
exotica, pronounced the bike fit-looking. The screen isn't raked as high as the FZR's endurance-derived item, forcing
the wind into your throat. A loaded tank bag is a better deflector but obscures
the instruments. The high pegs are a pain in the knees after 50 motorway miles;
relief is effected by riding flat footed, heel on the pegs, gumby style. Given
that the headlights are set back and enclosed, night roads get a good spread of
light (the FZR's dip cuts off far too short). Standard D202 Dunlops suit the GSX-R perfectly. In pant-staining bends they
give plenty grip with a balanced feel between front and rear: fine for public
roads but previous track sorties have shown they do overheat. Mark's suggestion
of fitting cut slicks for attacking the Lake District was ideal. At the time. Prior to having a tread pattern cut into the rear ex-race Michelin, I spied
P Mc Fl 4 laps on the sidewall. Good stuff: an ex-Phil McCallen TT tyre.
To my nicotine-fugged mind it seemed I was receiving the same service as the
racing greats. Back in the real world I was disappointed. At low speeds you can feel the
extra grip — on Delugrip-covered roundabouts the front tyre feels like it's
turning in glue and needs extra force on the bars to aim it. Out on faster,
dryer roads it's the opposite. On the M6 (120mph ish officer) the front goes
very light, bangs off cats' eyes alarmingly and is sensitive to any shift in
weight or bar input. At least it didn't suffer high speed weaves like the Exup.
On coarse road surfaces in the Lake District the slicks gave exceptional
peg-scraping grip but highlighted the need for suspension adjustment — more than
the standard setup can offer. My advice is stick to normal road tyres: it's
healthier for you and your licence. The GSX-R1100 struggles to hold its head high in the monster capacity class.
New, exciting models like the GSX-R750, Honda's Fireblade and Kawasaki's ZX-9R
have stolen its thunder in the last couple of years. Only if, like me, you think
big is best, does the Suzuki win, as it always has done. Trevor Franklin
|
|
Any corrections or more information on these motorcycles will be kindly appreciated. |